Carbon Sinks and Green Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Provincial Panel Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/p71p3d50Keywords:
Carbon sink, Green economic efficiency, SBM model, Mechanism analysis, regional heterogeneity.Abstract
Under China’s “dual carbon” strategy, carbon sinks—natural systems that absorb atmospheric CO₂—have become a key component of green development policy. This study uses provincial panel data from 2001 to 2021 and applies a Slack-Based Measure (SBM) model to estimate green economic efficiency. A two-way fixed effects regression is then used to assess the impact of carbon sink reserves on efficiency and explore potential mechanisms. Results show that: (1) carbon sinks significantly improve green economic efficiency, and this effect remains robust across lagged models, variable trimming, and alternative efficiency measures; (2) the positive effect is stronger in coal-intensive and less-developed regions, suggesting a compensatory ecological role; (3) mechanism analysis reveals that carbon sinks indirectly boost efficiency by promoting green technological innovation and encouraging industrial upgrading. This paper extends the existing literature by integrating ecological factors into the study of carbon efficiency and highlights the economic value of natural capital. Policy suggestions include improving carbon sink monitoring and trading systems, formulating region-specific ecological-industrial integration strategies, and enhancing incentives for low-carbon innovation.
Downloads
References
[1] State Council of China. Work Plan for Accelerating the Establishment of a Dual Control System for Carbon Emissions [EB/OL]. (2024). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202408/content_ 6966080.htm.
[2] NDRC, MEE, SAMR. Action Plan for Carbon Neutrality Standards and Measurement (2024–2025) [EB/OL]. (2024). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202408/content_6967197.htm.
[3] National Forestry and Grassland Administration. Guiding Opinions on Promoting Forest Carbon Sink Trading [EB/OL]. (2020). https://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/5925/20200414/09042163 9655185.html.
[4] Calvo Buendia E, Tanabe K, Kranjc A, et al. refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories [J]. IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019: 1 - 15.
[5] Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu L, et al. FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities [J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological society, 2001, 82 (11): 2415 - 2434.
[6] Friedlingstein P, O'sullivan M, Jones M W, et al. Global carbon budget 2022 [J]. Earth System Science Data, 2022, 14 (11): 4811 - 4900.
[7] Pan Y, Birdsey R A, Fang J, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests [J]. science, 2011, 333 (6045): 988 - 993.
[8] Yang Y, Shi Y, Sun W, et al. Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality [J]. Science China Life Sciences, 2022, 65 (5): 861 - 895.
[9] Yin S, Gong Z, Gu L, et al. Driving forces of the efficiency of forest carbon sequestration production: Spatial panel data from the national forest inventory in China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 330: 129776.
[10] Chen Z, Zhang X, Chen F. Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 168: 120744.
[11] Zhou X, Zhang J, Li J. Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China [J]. Energy policy, 2013, 57: 43 - 51.
[12] Wang D, Sun M, Meng B, et al. Can carbon market efficiency promote green technology innovation for Chinese companies? [J]. Energy, 2024, 309: 133157.
[13] Sueyoshi T, Goto M. Measurement of a linkage among environmental, operational, and financial performance in Japanese manufacturing firms: A use of Data Envelopment Analysis with strong complementary slackness condition [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207 (3): 1742 - 1753.
[14] Du M, Feng R, Chen Z. Blue sky defense in low-carbon pilot cities: A spatial spillover perspective of carbon emission efficiency [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 846: 157509.
[15] Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, et al. The environment and directed technical change [J]. American economic review, 2012, 102 (1): 131 - 166.
[16] Unruh G C. Understanding carbon lock-in [J]. Energy policy, 2000, 28 (12): 817 - 830.
[17] Wang J, Shi K, Hu M. Measurement of forest carbon sink efficiency and its influencing factors empirical evidence from China [J]. Forests, 2022, 13 (11): 1909.
[18] Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis [J]. European journal of operational research, 2001, 130 (3): 498 - 509.
[19] Shan Y, Guan D, Zheng H, et al. China CO2 emission accounts 1997 – 2015 [J]. Scientific data, 2018, 5 (1): 1 - 14.
[20] Shan Y, Huang Q, Guan D, et al. China CO2 emission accounts 2016 – 2017 [J]. Scientific data, 2020, 7 (1): 54.
[21] Zhang Jun, Wu Guiying, Zhang Jipeng. Estimation of China's inter-provincial physical capital stock: 1952 – 2000 [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2004, (10): 35 – 44. (in Chinese).
[22] Fu Wei, Li Long, Luo Mingcan, et al. Spatial spillover effects and influencing factors of forest carbon sinks in China: A provincial perspective [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43 (10): 4074 – 4085. (in Chinese).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
