Optimization of Curriculum Assessment Systems and Educational Measurement Strategies in Educational Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/th5qcn30Keywords:
Educational Administration, Curriculum Assessment, Educational Measurement, Process Assessment, Multidimensional Assessment.Abstract
The scientificity of curriculum evaluation directly determines the quality of curriculum teaching and the actual effectiveness of talent development. From the current implementation situation of various educational stages, there are still many problems in curriculum evaluation work, such as an overly narrow range of evaluation participants, incomplete recording of process learning information, a lack of standardized, unified measurement tools, and difficulty in applying evaluation results to improve teaching. Based on the relevant policy requirements of the new era education evaluation reform, this article combines the curriculum evaluation practices of some domestic universities and regions, identifies existing problems from an educational management perspective, and develops a multi-stakeholder curriculum assessment plan based on the basic norms of education measurement. At the same time, it proposes feasible measurement methods and quality assurance measures. These ideas and practices can provide reference for education management departments to optimize evaluation systems and standardize measurement processes, and can also align curriculum assessment with the fundamental goal of talent development, and gradually enhance the scientificity and applicability of educational management.
Downloads
References
[1] Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, & State Council of the People's Republic of China. (2020). Deepening the overall plan for the reform of educational evaluation in the new era. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202010/t20201013_494381.html
[2] Berk, R. A. (2009). Using the 360 multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism. Medical Teacher, 31(12), 1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590802572775
[3] Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
[4] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092 008 9068 5
[5] Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Publications.
[6] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2021). National compulsory education quality monitoring programme (2021 revised edition). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A11/moe_1789/202109/t20210926_567095.html
[7] Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165 016 9602 2
[8] Crisp, G. T. (2012). Integrative assessment: Reframing assessment practice for current and future learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.494234
[9] Quinn, D., & Shurville, S. (2009). From little things big things grow: Scaling up assessment of experiential learning. Campus Wide Information Systems, 26(5), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740911004769
[10] Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental?. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536
[11] Ministry of Education General Office of the People's Republic of China. (2023). Action plan for deepening the reform of basic education curriculum and teaching. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/jcj_kcjcgh/202306/t20230601_1062380.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
