How Cognitive Science Can Inform Inclusive Teaching Design for Students with Learning Differences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/qjkv3n93Keywords:
cognitive science, inclusive teaching, learning differences, distributed cognition, embodied cognition.Abstract
This essay examines how cognitive science can inform inclusive teaching design for students with learning differences, including dyslexia, ADHD, autism spectrum conditions, and differences in working memory and attention. It argues that inclusive pedagogy can be strengthened by integrating distributed cognition, embodied cognition, and neurodiversity. Distributed cognition shifts attention from individual deficits to the design of tools, peers, and classroom environments that reduce cognitive load. Embodied cognition highlights gesture, movement, and manipulation as integral to meaning-making rather than optional teaching aids. Neurodiversity provides the ethical framework for treating cognitive variation as a natural part of classroom life and for designing multiple routes into learning and assessment. Using a Year 3 fractions lesson as an example, the essay shows how these frameworks can be translated into practical strategies. It also critically examines limitations, including implementation at scale, risks of dependency, uneven evidence for universal design, and the danger of neurodiversity remaining rhetorical without structural change. The essay concludes that cognitive science supports inclusive teaching when theory, evidence, and student agency are held together.
Downloads
References
[1] Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
[2] Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Distribution of cognition between minds and artifacts: Augmentation of mediation? AI & Society, 10, 15–25.
[3] Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press.
[4] Ye, H. S. (2011). The dilemma of mind-body dualism and the rise of embodied cognition research. Psychological Science, 34(4), 999–1005.
[5] M. Wilson. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
[6] Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
[7] Seccia, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2024). Gestures can help children learn mathematics: How researchers can work with teachers to make gesture studies applicable to classrooms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379(1911), 20230156. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0156
[8] Shvarts, A., Bos, R., Doorman, M., & Drijvers, P. (2024). Reifying actions into artifacts: Process-object duality from an embodied perspective on mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 117(2), 193–214.
[9] Zhang, L. (2013). On the curriculum and teaching implications of embodied cognition theory. Global Education Outlook, 42(4), 27–32, 67.
[10] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
[11] Armstrong, T. (2010). Neurodiversity: Discovering the extraordinary gifts of autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and other brain differences. Da Capo Press.
[12] Chapman, R. (2021). Neurodiversity and the social ecology of mental functions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1360–1372.
[13] CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines (Version 2.2).
[14] Ontong, J. M., & Rossouw, M. (2024). The role of extra time in the performance of students with learning disabilities in time-constrained assessment. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2334559. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2334559
[15] Videla, R., Aros, M. B., Parada, F., Kausel, L., Sandoval-Obando, E., Jorquera, D., Ibacache, D., Maluenda, S., Rodriguez-Herrero, P., Cerpa, C., Gonzalez, M. J., Chavez, M., & Ramirez, P. (2025). Neurodiversity: Post-cognitivist foundations of the 3E approach for educational inclusion of autistic students with technology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, 1493863. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fnhum.2024.1493863
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
