What are the Ethical Considerations to Keep in Mind When Integrating New Educational Technologies into the Classroom?: A Case Study of Artificial Intelligence

Authors

  • Xuanyu Pu Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ffwgbs35

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence; Educational Technology; Classroom Ethics; Ethical Principles; Educational Equity.

Abstract

New educational technologies—such as artificial intelligence (AI), generative AI, and wearable monitoring devices—are profoundly reshaping classroom ecologies. While they drive greater precision, personalization, and efficiency in teaching and learning, they also give rise to multiple ethical dilemmas, including data privacy breaches, the entrenchment of algorithmic bias, the alienation of teacher-student relationships, the erosion of student agency, and the blurring of responsibility attribution. Grounded in the fundamental educational mission of "fostering virtue and cultivating persons," this paper dialectically examines four core ethical tensions arising from the integration of new educational technologies into the classroom: efficiency versus humanism, empowerment versus rights, fairness versus bias, and autonomy versus discipline. It systematically distills five overarching ethical principles—rights protection, fairness and justice, humanistic authenticity, agency cultivation, and shared responsibility—and proposes a practical pathway characterized by technology for good, ethics-first design, and multi-stakeholder governance. Finally, this paper provides a critical evaluation of the structural friction and feasibility limits of these principles, aiming to establish a robust moral foundation for the beneficial integration of technology and education within the global landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence and data in teaching and learning for educators. Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture.

[2] Liu, X., & Trent, J. (2023). Teacher identity construction under Chinese education reform: Navigating professional autonomy and digital accountability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103-115.

[3] OECD. (2023). Shaping digital education: Framework for digital education governance and the future of AI in classrooms. OECD Publishing.

[4] Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

[5] Snoek, M., Volman, M., & Dijkstra, E. (2025). Wearable monitoring and datafication in the classroom: Implications for the humanistic value of education and teacher-student relationships. Journal of Educational Technology & Ethics, 19(2), 145-162.

[6] UNESCO. (2021). Beijing consensus on artificial intelligence and education. UNESCO Publishing.

[7] UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing.

[8] Zhu, H., Sun, Y., & Yang, J. (2025). Ethical risks and systemic governance of artificial intelligence applications in education: A systematic review. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100-118.

Downloads

Published

05-10-2026

How to Cite

Pu, X. (2026). What are the Ethical Considerations to Keep in Mind When Integrating New Educational Technologies into the Classroom?: A Case Study of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 64, 164-170. https://doi.org/10.54097/ffwgbs35